By Glynn Wilson –
A majority of Americans, 57 percent, believe increases in the Earth’s temperature during the past century are due to pollution from human activities, while 40 percent still say it is due to naturally occurring changes in the environment, in spite of overwhelming scientific evidence and incredibly rare scientific consensus showing that the burning of fossil fuels is the culprit.
According to the latest Gallup poll on the subject, the breakdown of views on this issue is essentially unchanged from 2013, although the latest data reflects broader agreement with the idea that humankind is responsible for global warming than was the case from 2010 through 2012, when barely half said they agreed with that position. Agreement that human activities are behind global warming reached its historical peak in 2007, when 61 percent took that position.
Even though a majority of Americans agree with the scientific evidence, and a record high of 33 percent of people say they understand the issue âvery well,â not that many express great concern over the potential consequences, according to Gallup. The percentage of Americans worried about global warming as well as “climate change” still ranks low relative to economic issues, and barely a third of people expect global warming to pose a serious threat in their own lifetimes.
âLeading climate science researchers in the U.S. and globally — including those at the International Panel on Climate Change, a U.N. body that is at the forefront of climate research — are convinced that elevated levels of carbon dioxide and other byproducts of fossil fuel use are the reason the Earth’s temperature has warmed,â Gallup says. âNevertheless, Americans who say they are highly knowledgeable about global warming are no more likely than those who profess little knowledge of the issue to believe humans are to blame.â
Partisan Differences
Between 2008 and 2010, Republicans became much more likely to claim a solid understanding of global warming, according to Gallup, while high understanding among Democrats remained relatively low at that time.
The pattern changed âsharplyâ between 2007 and 2010, according to Gallupâs numbers, when the group that claimed to be the most informed became the most skeptical according to public opinion research. That period spanned the release of some hacked emails that were leaked in 2009 that became an over-sensationalized story in the news media called âClimategate,â which handed partisan global-warming skeptics ammunition to claim researchers were suppressing scientific information and simply profiting from research. Since then it was proved that the discussions had little impact on the research itself, and claims to the contrary were overblown.
âSince then, Democrats’ knowledge has surged, while Republicans’ has been fairly steady,â Gallup says. âSelf-reported knowledge about the global warming issue is ⦠up among all three political groups compared with a decade ago.â
Gallup’s research shows little relation between Americans’ levels of formal education and their agreement with the idea that human activities cause global warming. College graduates are just slightly more likely than adults without a college degree to believe human activities are to blame, but the number is not significant.
Far more than education or self reported knowledge levels, political affiliation dictates the degree to which Americans believe humans are responsible for global warming, with Democrats much more likely to hold this position than Republicans. The partisan gap has widened in recent years, no wonder since Americans more than ever turn to news sources they agree with more than objective news sources for information. Republicans still get much of their news from talk radio and Fox News, while Democrats turn to a wider array of news outlets for news and information, including newspapers, news Websites, public radio and the like.
Gallupâs Bottom Line
âDespite (a self-reported) increased knowledge, slightly fewer Americans today than in 2001 agree with global warming proponents that the Earth’s warming is âanthropogenic,â” according to Gallup, âin other words, the result of humans’ influence on nature.â
The 57 percent who believe humans are the cause is up from the low point recorded in 2010 (50 percent), but still not back to earlier levels.
âImportantly, public skepticism about the human role in global warming is not based on lack of education. College-educated Americans are barely more likely than those without a college degree to ascribe global warming to humans,â Gallup says. âNor do Americans who consider themselves knowledgeable on the subject show more support for the pollution theory. Rather, as is the case with so many other measures of public attitudes on global warming, politics are the guiding force, with most Democrats accepting the prevailing scientific view that pollution is the cause and most Republicans believing it is a natural climatic cycle, not man-made.â
Survey Methods
Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted March 6-9, 2014, with a random sample of 1,048 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level.
Before you continue, I’d like to ask if you could support our independent journalism as we head into one of the most critical news periods of our time in 2024.
The New American Journal is deeply dedicated to uncovering the escalating threats to our democracy and holding those in power accountable. With a turbulent presidential race and the possibility of an even more extreme Trump presidency on the horizon, the need for independent, credible journalism that emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election for our nation and planet has never been greater.
However, a small group of billionaire owners control a significant portion of the information that reaches the public. We are different. We don’t have a billionaire owner or shareholders. Our journalism is created to serve the public interest, not to generate profit. Unlike much of the U.S. media, which often falls into the trap of false equivalence in the name of neutrality, we strive to highlight the lies of powerful individuals and institutions, showing how misinformation and demagoguery can harm democracy.
Our journalists provide context, investigate, and bring to light the critical stories of our time, from election integrity threats to the worsening climate crisis and complex international conflicts. As a news organization with a strong voice, we offer a unique, outsider perspective that is often missing in American media.
Thanks to our unique reader-supported model, you can access the New American journal without encountering a paywall. This is possible because of readers like you. Your support keeps us independent, free from external influences, and accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for news.
Please help if you can.
American journalists need your help more than ever as forces amass against the free press and democracy itself. We must not let the crypto-fascists and the AI bots take over.
See the latest GoFundMe campaign here.
Don't forget to listen to the new song and video.
Just because we are not featured on cable TV news talk shows, or TikTok videos, does not mean we are not getting out there in search engines and social media sites. We consistently get over a million hits a month.
Click to Advertise Here