By Pippa Abston –
MD, PhD, FAAP –
Governor Bentley has persisted in failing to offer hope for the uninsured poor in Alabama, through a Medicaid Expansion or otherwise.
Behind the scenes, various insiders are passing rumors not to worry — he really will do it … after the primary. Or after the general election.
If the rumors are true, the plan is to apply for a âprivate optionâ style Medicaid waiver similar to programs in Arkansas and a handful of other states, and he is making people wait for his personal political interests, without regard to their present needs.
If the rumors are not true, one can imagine he might benefit from public perception that he is simultaneously accepting and declining the expansion.
One of the candidates in the Democratic Primary, Parker Griffith, got supporters by promising to expand Medicaid. Now he has revealed his grand idea: private option Medicaid, the same type of program Governor Bentley is or is not planning.
Except it isnât such a grand idea.
Private option Medicaid is Fake Medicaid.
One writer called it âConservativesâ Awful New Medicaid Ployâ — and it isnât even conservative. It is just a way to siphon off federal and eventually state money into private pockets, away from providing needed healthcare.
Instead of simply directly adding people to the existing state Medicaid program, to be funded mostly by federal money and with generally about 3 percent overhead, it uses those funds to purchase private insurance at significantly higher overhead and for profit. Itâs a skillful bit of flim-flammery to convince conservatives that this is anything but a scam and liberals that it is the only choiceâfake Medicaid or none.
These ânewâ — what scam is ever really new? — programs donât just eat up healthcare funds. They have to limit health services to turn a profit. How?
By charging people with no money premiums and/or co-pays, so they will be discouraged from applying at all or seeking care if they do. You may think $35 a month for a household premium isnât muchâif you do, you arenât likely poor enough to qualify for Medicaid. Even $3 can mean the difference between filling a prescription and skipping it.
By adding âwellness programsâ of no proven cost-savings, an additional time charge for workers without sick leave. See page xix of a large analysis on workplace wellness programs by Rand: â[w]e estimate the average annual difference to be $157, but the change is not statistically significant.â This doesnât mean $157 isnât significantâit means the $157 âdifferenceâ is most likely due to chance instead of a difference and could just as easily be a $157 loss.
By charging a fine for coming to the ER for a non-emergency, instead of making sure all patients have 24-7 access to primary care and developing better ways to triage and redirect patients to appropriate settings. By charging $50 for the crime of being sick enough to be admitted to the hospital.
Already, just a few months in, Arkansas is finding out how much this fake Medicaid is going to cost them. Are we really looking to follow their footsteps? If you havenât read Confessions of an Economic Hitman, I highly recommend it. I suspect we are currently the target of the same strategy used to bring developing countries into debt, except this time it is on our own soil.
Both Bentley and Griffith were practicing doctors. I find it hard to believe they are completely unaware of the harm a private option Medicaid could do to patients and our stateâs economy. Even so, it may be worth your time to tell them.
For those who have decided the fake option is better than nothing, it might not be so. Once people get their Medicaid cards, they will no longer be able to visit free clinics, get charity care, or apply for patient assistance programs for medicines. I am not sure how to predict whether on balance more people will be better off. I can say with a fair amount of certainty that a good many people will be actively harmed. Sometimes a false front for a good thing is actually far worse than nothing.
Fortunately, there is no reason to believe the choice is between fake Medicaid and nothing. We have more options. We can support candidates who are supporting the real Medicaid Expansion. Democrats could consider taking a look at Kevin Bass in the primary. Those who are determined to support Griffith could put pressure on him to drop the fake Medicaid idea. Republicans could put Bentley on the spot, and decide not to support someone who is/is not doingâhasnât done — anything specific to address un-insurance and its economic damage to hospitals around the state. You can speak up against wasting funds in a fake program.
In that same vein, thereâs no real reason we need to keep putting ourselves in the position of choosing between only two parties, between private insurance and nothing, or between all manner of pretend reforms and nothing. Some of you reading this are donating substantial sums or time to a lose-lose game. Are you getting what youâve paid for?
Republished with permission under a Creative Commons license from Pippa Abston’s Blog. She is a physician in Huntsville Alabama who writes about health care.
Before you continue, I’d like to ask if you could support our independent journalism as we head into one of the most critical news periods of our time in 2024.
The New American Journal is deeply dedicated to uncovering the escalating threats to our democracy and holding those in power accountable. With a turbulent presidential race and the possibility of an even more extreme Trump presidency on the horizon, the need for independent, credible journalism that emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election for our nation and planet has never been greater.
However, a small group of billionaire owners control a significant portion of the information that reaches the public. We are different. We don’t have a billionaire owner or shareholders. Our journalism is created to serve the public interest, not to generate profit. Unlike much of the U.S. media, which often falls into the trap of false equivalence in the name of neutrality, we strive to highlight the lies of powerful individuals and institutions, showing how misinformation and demagoguery can harm democracy.
Our journalists provide context, investigate, and bring to light the critical stories of our time, from election integrity threats to the worsening climate crisis and complex international conflicts. As a news organization with a strong voice, we offer a unique, outsider perspective that is often missing in American media.
Thanks to our unique reader-supported model, you can access the New American journal without encountering a paywall. This is possible because of readers like you. Your support keeps us independent, free from external influences, and accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for news.
Please help if you can.
American journalists need your help more than ever as forces amass against the free press and democracy itself. We must not let the crypto-fascists and the AI bots take over.
See the latest GoFundMe campaign here or click on this image.
Don't forget to listen to the new song and video.
Just because we are not featured on cable TV news talk shows, or TikTok videos, does not mean we are not getting out there in search engines and social media sites. We consistently get over a million hits a month.
Click to Advertise Here