The Big Picture –
By Glynn Wilson –
THURMONT, Md. – The weather forecast is calling for a dusting of snow here in the woods north of Washington, D.C. Thursday night, which we might as well call the first act of winter after one of the most lovely falls in memory for the people of Maryland and Virginia. We plan to stay here in the Cunningham Falls State Park for another night to get photos before heading south.
Meanwhile down in the nation’s capital, there are two political wars brewing as Congress returns after a bruising election and the president tours China.
In a bold stroke this week, President Obama weighed in on the Net Neutrality debate in a big way by coming out forcefully for the Federal Communications Commission to treat the Internet as a public utility rather than a capitalist commercial zone for the telecom giants.
The president indicated the FCC should reclassify broadband as a public utility under Title II of the Communications Act, broadening the agency’s authority to regulate the behavior of Internet service providers such as Comcast, Verizon and ATnT. He called for a ban on “paid prioritization,” the idea of commercial Internet Service Providers charging content companies like Netflix for Internet fast lanes to consumers while discriminating against smaller media companies such as the New American Journal by making it harder for consumers to access sites that do not have big, corporate bucks behind them.
“This is a basic acknowledgment of the services ISPs provide to American homes and businesses and the straightforward obligations necessary to ensure the network works for everyone — not just one or two companies,” the president said in his statement.
While FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler responded by pointing out that the agency is independent and will take the president’s remarks into account like all the other 4 million people who have submitted public comments on his proposed rules, the president’s remarks constitute big news and the FCC would do well to listen to him. The Obama administration, congressional Democrats and tech activists are trying to get out in front of the conservative, business-led backlash against net neutrality since the Republicans just regained control of the U.S. Senate in last week’s election.
“When the leader of the Free World says the Internet should remain free, that’s a game-changer,” Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said in a statement.
Let’s hope so. I have been chasing Internet access in a camper van all over Maryland and Virginia for the past two months, and I can tell you unequivocally that the capitalist, commercial approach to serving up access to this important and even essential technology to the American public is iffy at best. If the telecom giants had their way, based on their limited interest in quarterly profits and stock prices, Americans in urban areas would get served while those in rural areas would get screwed.
The president is right to compare the Net to early phone service in the U.S., when regulators in Washington treated phone service as a public right all over the land, not just in concentrated population centers where companies could maximize profits.
Of course the phone companies were deregulated in the 1980s in the Reagan conservative tide, and are now nothing more than capitalist enterprises hell bent on dismantling the old copper phone line network and using Internet access as the excuse to do it. But if you can’t find access to the Internet in places like Western Maryland or the mountains of Virginia, many Americans will be left out in the cold without access to the most basic information necessary to live a full life in the modern world.
The most basic service required is access to emergency services, and without a land line to call 911, many Americans will find themselves at risk. On top of that, in rural areas there is still very limited television news offerings and even radio is often limited to country music stations, conservative talk and Christian radio in places where public radio does not reach — like northeast Alabama.
This does not seem to bother the Republicans in Congress, who are now stepping up their game to fight Net Neutrality like it would mean the end of the world — for the Republican Party.
Public opinion data consistently shows that the more education and information people have, the more likely they are to vote for Democrats. For the Republican Party to survive and thrive then, they want to keep a huge chunk of the population ignorant, afraid of the Internet and listening to talk radio and watching Fox News. The rest of the media in this country — especially those of us engaged in building the Web Press of the future — should not let them get away with it.
Meanwhile, the president and Secretary of State John Kerry toured China this week and came away with a historic joint announcement on climate change and clean energy cooperation. The U.S. has pledged to cut its net greenhouse gas emissions to between 26 and 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025, while China will attempt to peak its CO2 emissions by 2030 and increase the share of non-fossil fuel energy it uses to around 20 percent.
Of course the Republicans will no doubt fight this too. They came back from the election recess this week and started moving forward with a plan to approve the Keystone XL Pipeline while the president was out of the country.
Emboldened by their election victories in key states where voter turnout was low, allowing more conservatives to take positions in the U.S. Senate and setting the stage for Mitch McConnell of Kentucky to take over as Senate Majority Leader next year, it is going to be a war for America’s soul in Washington for the next two years.
Dog help us all if women and young people do not turn out in large enough numbers to stop Jeb Bush from retaking the White House in 2016. If we really want some semblance of democracy to survive, we cannot let this happen people. Get ready to vote.
Before you continue, I’d like to ask if you could support our independent journalism as we head into one of the most critical news periods of our time in 2024.
The New American Journal is deeply dedicated to uncovering the escalating threats to our democracy and holding those in power accountable. With a turbulent presidential race and the possibility of an even more extreme Trump presidency on the horizon, the need for independent, credible journalism that emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election for our nation and planet has never been greater.
However, a small group of billionaire owners control a significant portion of the information that reaches the public. We are different. We don’t have a billionaire owner or shareholders. Our journalism is created to serve the public interest, not to generate profit. Unlike much of the U.S. media, which often falls into the trap of false equivalence in the name of neutrality, we strive to highlight the lies of powerful individuals and institutions, showing how misinformation and demagoguery can harm democracy.
Our journalists provide context, investigate, and bring to light the critical stories of our time, from election integrity threats to the worsening climate crisis and complex international conflicts. As a news organization with a strong voice, we offer a unique, outsider perspective that is often missing in American media.
Thanks to our unique reader-supported model, you can access the New American journal without encountering a paywall. This is possible because of readers like you. Your support keeps us independent, free from external influences, and accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for news.
Please help if you can.
American journalists need your help more than ever as forces amass against the free press and democracy itself. We must not let the crypto-fascists and the AI bots take over.
See the latest GoFundMe campaign here or click on this image.
Don't forget to listen to the new song and video.
Just because we are not featured on cable TV news talk shows, or TikTok videos, does not mean we are not getting out there in search engines and social media sites. We consistently get over a million hits a month.
Click to Advertise Here
Right on point, Glynn. The two Alabama Senators are jockeying for position now that the low voter turnout put the Republicans in control of both houses of Congress. Shelby is again preparing to take over leadership of the Senate Banking Committee, which he lost when the Democrats won control of the Senate in 2010 midterm elections. People do not remember, but it was Shelby who was the ranking member and chairman of the Senate Banking Committee when the economy began to unravel in 2006 and finally collapsed in 2008. If Jeb runs in 2016 and is elected and Shelby remains in office and chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, the American people will get the worst of everything, except a little tidbit now and then to try and keep them passifed and under control while the special interests ravage the country scooping up and taking what they want to fulfill their agendas.
Poor, old Dick Shelby is such a tool of the tea party. Too bad. He could have been a great Senator if he had remained a Democrat and actually led his people rather than following the conservative tide.
The FCC chairman poised to defy Obama was a communications industry lobbyist appointed by Obama to head this agency overseeing the industry…when deciding whether to approve him for this position the Dems considered only whether he had the experience and qualifications necessary for the job, not what his ideology and allegiances were…they have repeatedly made the same mistake with supreme court nominees also…consider the results…Repubs don’t make this mistake.
According to Politicos reporting today, Wheeler says he agrees with Obama.
“Chairman Tom Wheeler shares the president’s goal — he wants enforceable rules that preserve an open Internet,” Wheeler adviser Gigi Sohn said on “The Diane Rehm Show” on public radio station WAMU.
And this seems to say the opposite: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/11/11/the-fcc-weighs-breaking-with-obama-over-the-future-of-the-internet/
Interesting stuff. Interesting issue. Politics and reality are not one and the same thing, anymore than democracy and capitalism are one and the same thing.
As a journalist looking for the objective facts, I like President Obama’s position on net neutrality. But in political terms, Wheeler will have to craft something that the corporations and the courts can live with.
At least the president’s statement was educational on a mass scale so that the American people may better understand the issue. It’s a discussion we should be having and now it’s on the front page.