By Frank Newport and Glynn Wilson –
The public images of Ted Cruz and Donald Trump among Republicans have dropped to all-time lows in recent days as exchanges between the Republican presidential candidates have turned highly negative and personal, according to the latest Gallup poll on the subject.
Cruz’s net favorable rating among Republicans is now only plus 14, his lowest to date and essentially the same as Trump’s at plus 15. Marco Rubio’s image is less positive than it has been at previous points in the campaign, but still stands at plus 34, the same as in early January.
“Rubio’s net favorable score is now twice as high as the scores of either of his major two competitors,” Gallup says.
The net favorable ratings Republicans and Republican-leaning independents give to Cruz, Trump and Rubio are all at or near their lowest since tracking began, underscoring the clear toll the campaign has apparently taken on how Republicans view these contenders. The latest update comes from Gallup polling conducted Feb. 21-27, at a time the leading Republican candidates intensified their rhetoric against one another. This includes the 10th Republican debate on Feb. 25 and a Trump campaign event on Friday during which New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie endorsed his candidacy.
Ted Cruz
Cruz registered his campaign’s highest net favorable score (+48) among Republicans and Republican leaners in late December, but his image has soured since. His current score (+14) is the lowest since Gallup began tracking images in July.
“Cruz, who has come under attack by not only Trump and Rubio, but also by GOP candidate Ben Carson for his perceived use of underhanded campaign tactics, has seen his popularity drop farther than any other GOP candidate in 2016,” Gallup says.
His image has worsened across most groups of Republicans when compared with his standings in the first two weeks of this year. Only among “very conservative” and highly religious Republicans is Cruz’s level of popularity roughly where it was in the first two weeks of January, although he continues to hold a more positive image with men than women, with core Republican identifiers than independents who lean Republican, and among conservative Republicans. He has a net negative score among moderate/liberal Republicans.
Cruz is more popular among those with at least some college education, and those who are highly religious (with a negative net favorable score among those who are not religious).
Donald Trump
Trump has long been relatively unpopular among national Republicans, and his average net favorable score (+22) in the nine months Gallup has been tracking images is well below Rubio’s or Cruz’s average over the same period.
Trump’s net favorable rating with Republicans reached plus 9 for the seven days ending Feb. 24, its lowest point since tracking began, before edging back to his current plus 15. His highest net favorable rating was plus 33 in late August and early September.
With Republicans, Trump is viewed most positively by men aged 55 and older and those with some college education but no degree. He is viewed more negatively by women, 18- to 34-year-olds and those with a postgraduate education.
Marco Rubio
Though yet to finish first in any primary contest, Rubio is the most popular of the three major candidates among national Republicans.
“His current net favorable score of plus 34 is more than twice that of either Cruz or Trump,” Gallup says.
Rubio began the year with a +34 net favorable, identical to his current rating. His average net favorable score of plus 40 since tracking began is higher than the average of either of the other top two candidates. His most positive net favorable score of plus 50 was reached in mid-November.
“This marked the second-highest net favorable score earned by any of the 17 candidates Gallup has measured — behind only the scores in the 50-point and 60-point range registered by Carson in the late summer and early fall,” Gallup says.
Rubio’s image skews highest among Republican identifiers, conservative Republicans, those with a college education and those who are highly religious. His biggest improvement this year has been with Republican women, who now give him a net favorable score about nine points higher than he received earlier this year.
Gallup’s Implications
“While there has been no shortage of unflattering remarks throughout much of the GOP campaign, the increased amount of personal attacks and insults over the past week likely have negatively affected both Cruz’s and Trump’s images, although the latter’s image has recovered slightly in recent days,” Gallup says. “Cruz is less well-liked by Republicans and Republican-leaning independents than at any point since Gallup tracking began nine months ago.”
Rubio maintains a considerably more positive image than either Trump or Cruz, but his net favorable rating is lower than it has been at previous points in the campaign.
“Republicans’ much more favorable image of Rubio than of Trump or Cruz has not translated into first-place finishes in primary contests so far for the Florida senator. This may partly reflect that Trump’s appeal is not based on his being likable or personable, but rather on his rough, critical and reaction-generating persona,” Gallup concludes.
This was on display in the past week, when Rubio’s campaign made the decision to copy that more negative, baiting style associated with Trump, according to Gallup.
“Undoubtedly, this is a risk for Rubio. He could hurt his own image more than Trump’s by engaging in this type of dialogue,” Gallup says. “But given Trump’s impressive performance thus far in the primaries, Rubio and his advisers may think this is his best gamble to wrestle the lead from the current front-runner.”
Survey Methods
Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted on a continuous basis on the Gallup U.S. Daily survey. The latest update used in this report is based on interviewing conducted Feb. 21-27, 2016, with random samples of between 754 and 810 Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, rating each of the three candidates. For results based on the total sample of Republicans, the margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.
Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 60 percent cellphone respondents and 40 percent landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods.
Before you continue, I’d like to ask if you could support our independent journalism as we head into one of the most critical news periods of our time in 2024.
The New American Journal is deeply dedicated to uncovering the escalating threats to our democracy and holding those in power accountable. With a turbulent presidential race and the possibility of an even more extreme Trump presidency on the horizon, the need for independent, credible journalism that emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election for our nation and planet has never been greater.
However, a small group of billionaire owners control a significant portion of the information that reaches the public. We are different. We don’t have a billionaire owner or shareholders. Our journalism is created to serve the public interest, not to generate profit. Unlike much of the U.S. media, which often falls into the trap of false equivalence in the name of neutrality, we strive to highlight the lies of powerful individuals and institutions, showing how misinformation and demagoguery can harm democracy.
Our journalists provide context, investigate, and bring to light the critical stories of our time, from election integrity threats to the worsening climate crisis and complex international conflicts. As a news organization with a strong voice, we offer a unique, outsider perspective that is often missing in American media.
Thanks to our unique reader-supported model, you can access the New American journal without encountering a paywall. This is possible because of readers like you. Your support keeps us independent, free from external influences, and accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for news.
Please help if you can.
American journalists need your help more than ever as forces amass against the free press and democracy itself. We must not let the crypto-fascists and the AI bots take over.
See the latest GoFundMe campaign here.
Don't forget to listen to the new song and video.
Just because we are not featured on cable TV news talk shows, or TikTok videos, does not mean we are not getting out there in search engines and social media sites. We consistently get over a million hits a month.
Click to Advertise Here