Bernie Sanders Slams The New York Times for Horse Race Conflict Coverage and Ignoring ‘Real Issues’

180041 600 - Bernie Sanders Slams The New York Times for Horse Race Conflict Coverage and Ignoring ‘Real Issues’

By Glynn Wilson –

Defying the odds and the oddsmakers in the mainstream media, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is still alive in the race for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, and one of the reasons his campaign resonates with so many people is because the traditional press in America would rather focus on the conflict between him and his primary opponent Hillary Clinton than “real issues.”

While his democratic socialist campaign has stoked support for the “shrinking middle class” and “rising wealth inequality in America,” the press is still focused on the so-called “horse race.”

From his campaign in Santa Barbara, Calif., Sanders went on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and called out The New York Times, a paper that has long been percieved as liberal but in realilty is and always has been mainstream and establishment.

The New York Times, I’ll tell you. I have a real problem with The New York Times,” Sanders said, “which from day one has been trying to be very dismissive of our campaign and has been very negative about our campaign.”

The Times recently interview people on the street in California slamming Sanders as a “socialist” who “can’t win.” (Link not provided because The Times content is now hidden behind a pay wall).

Sanders countered that “You can go out and you can talk to millions of people and you get any response that you want.”

The New York Times, he said, “goes around and talks to a handful of people, does a front-page story, that is a problem with The New York Times and not for my campaign.”

“Our campaign is about defeating Secretary Clinton on the real issues,” he said. “I want to break up the big banks, she doesn’t. I want to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour, she wants $12 an hour. I voted against the war in Iraq, she voted for the war in Iraq. I believe we should ban fracking, she does not. I believe we should have a tax on carbon and deal aggressively with climate change, that is not her position. Those are some of the issues that I am campaigning on.”

Sanders also argued that “in order for the Democrats to win” against Trump in November, “they’re going to have to address the needs of working people, standing up to Wall Street, standing up to the greed of corporate America, even now and then standing up to the media.”

When pressed by Chuck Todd to weigh in on the FBI investigation of Clinton’s email practices while Secretary of State, Sanders punted the issue down the road.

“I think the American people are tired of that type of politics,” he said. “I think the media and the candidates have got to talk about why the middle class is in decline and why we have massive levels of income and wealth inequality. Those have been talking about. And those are the issues I focus on.”

“I just gave an hour long speech here in Santa Barbara,” Sanders continued, “and it wasn’t about emails, it was about the future of the middle class and some of the fundamental problems that they’re facing.”

Watch the full “Meet the Press” interview video here:

Glynn Wilson, author of Jump On The Bus and editor and publisher of the independent New American Journal, is a veteran newspaper reporter, magazine writer and editorial columnist with more than three decades of experience covering public affairs and science for traditional news outlets such as The Nation, The New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor, The Dallas Morning News and UPI.

We hope you enjoyed this article.

Before you continue, I’d like to ask if you could support our independent journalism as we head into one of the most critical news periods of our time in 2024.

The New American Journal is deeply dedicated to uncovering the escalating threats to our democracy and holding those in power accountable. With a turbulent presidential race and the possibility of an even more extreme Trump presidency on the horizon, the need for independent, credible journalism that emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election for our nation and planet has never been greater.

However, a small group of billionaire owners control a significant portion of the information that reaches the public. We are different. We don’t have a billionaire owner or shareholders. Our journalism is created to serve the public interest, not to generate profit. Unlike much of the U.S. media, which often falls into the trap of false equivalence in the name of neutrality, we strive to highlight the lies of powerful individuals and institutions, showing how misinformation and demagoguery can harm democracy.

Our journalists provide context, investigate, and bring to light the critical stories of our time, from election integrity threats to the worsening climate crisis and complex international conflicts. As a news organization with a strong voice, we offer a unique, outsider perspective that is often missing in American media.

Thanks to our unique reader-supported model, you can access the New American journal without encountering a paywall. This is possible because of readers like you. Your support keeps us independent, free from external influences, and accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for news.

Please help if you can.

American journalists need your help more than ever as forces amass against the free press and democracy itself. We must not let the crypto-fascists and the AI bots take over.

See the latest GoFundMe campaign here.

Don't forget to listen to the new song and video.

Just because we are not featured on cable TV news talk shows, or TikTok videos, does not mean we are not getting out there in search engines and social media sites. We consistently get over a million hits a month.

Click to Advertise Here

NAJ 2024 traffic Sept - Bernie Sanders Slams The New York Times for Horse Race Conflict Coverage and Ignoring ‘Real Issues’

0 0 votes
Article Rating
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Herb Wagner
8 years ago

This has been the status of reporting on the elections for decades now. There is no interest in reporting on the issues, that would require study. The talking heads are little more than sports announcers reporting on the score and exaggerating the action.