But Americans continue to favor her confirmation by a nearly 2-to-1 margin –
Staff Report –
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson appears to be bound for the Supreme Court after coming through last week’s four-day confirmation hearing relatively unscathed, but the latest Morning Consult/Politico poll suggests that some of the questioning she faced from Senate Republicans swayed some conservatives to turn against her confirmation.
In the latest survey, 26 percent of voters said the Senate should not confirm Jackson, an increase of 7 percentage points from a survey conducted just before her Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, the largest weekly shift in either direction measured in tracking that began after her nomination was announced in late February.
The uptick was driven by Republicans and independents: 49 percent of Republican voters polled now say Jackson should not be confirmed, up 13 points over the past week, while independents registered a smaller bump in opposition, from 18 percent to 25 percent.
But 47 percent of all voters remain in support of her confirmation, and Jackson’s standing compares favorably with Amy Coney Barrett, who emerged from her Supreme Court hearing in October 2020 with 51 percent in favor of her confirmation and 28 percent opposed.
Ahead of the hearing, there was little doubt that Jackson would be confirmed, according to Morning Consult, and none of last week’s events did anything to change that, they say.
On Friday, Senator Joe Manchin, the West Virginia Democrat, told reporters he will vote for Jackson, likely guaranteeing her confirmation. Throughout this Congress he has sometimes frustrated liberals by resisting their priorities. But not this time.
Related: The Ideal of Justice on Trial: The Rise of Judge Jackson and the Fall of Clarence Thomas
For their part, Senate Republicans on the Judiciary Committee with presidential aspirations — such as Ted Cruz of Texas, Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Josh Hawley of Missouri — used their time to scrutinize her judicial record, especially on sentencing, to paint her as insufficiently tough on crime. Jackson was also asked to weigh in on hot-button cultural topics by Cruz and Tennessee Republican Marsha Blackburn, who asked her to provide a definition of the word “woman.”
Those lines of questioning toward the nation’s first Black female Supreme Court nominee prompted a range of criticism about Republicans’ conduct, and the latest survey found that Jackson came across well with the 68 percent of the U.S. electorate who said they had heard “a lot” or “some” about the hearing. Those voters were also divided about the performance of the committee’s Republicans.
At least 3 in 5 voters who consumed coverage of the hearing said Jackson came off as respectful, competent, kind and honest. Roughly 4 in 5 Democrats said these words described her well, while at least 2 in 5 Republicans agreed.
Nearly half of voters who had heard about the hearing, meanwhile, described Republican senators’ behavior as unkind (49%), disrespectful and unfair (47% each), while slightly fewer (40%) said the word “dishonest” described their conduct well.
The latest Morning Consult/Politico survey was conducted March 25-27, 2022, among a representative sample of 2,006 registered U.S. voters, with an unweighted margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.
___
If you support truth in reporting with no paywall, and fearless writing with no popup ads or sponsored content, consider making a contribution today with GoFundMe or Patreon or PayPal.
Before you continue, I’d like to ask if you could support our independent journalism as we head into one of the most critical news periods of our time in 2024.
The New American Journal is deeply dedicated to uncovering the escalating threats to our democracy and holding those in power accountable. With a turbulent presidential race and the possibility of an even more extreme Trump presidency on the horizon, the need for independent, credible journalism that emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election for our nation and planet has never been greater.
However, a small group of billionaire owners control a significant portion of the information that reaches the public. We are different. We don’t have a billionaire owner or shareholders. Our journalism is created to serve the public interest, not to generate profit. Unlike much of the U.S. media, which often falls into the trap of false equivalence in the name of neutrality, we strive to highlight the lies of powerful individuals and institutions, showing how misinformation and demagoguery can harm democracy.
Our journalists provide context, investigate, and bring to light the critical stories of our time, from election integrity threats to the worsening climate crisis and complex international conflicts. As a news organization with a strong voice, we offer a unique, outsider perspective that is often missing in American media.
Thanks to our unique reader-supported model, you can access the New American journal without encountering a paywall. This is possible because of readers like you. Your support keeps us independent, free from external influences, and accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for news.
Please help if you can.
American journalists need your help more than ever as forces amass against the free press and democracy itself. We must not let the crypto-fascists and the AI bots take over.
See the latest GoFundMe campaign here or click on this image.
Don't forget to listen to the new song and video.
Just because we are not featured on cable TV news talk shows, or TikTok videos, does not mean we are not getting out there in search engines and social media sites. We consistently get over a million hits a month.
Click to Advertise Here