Policy Agenda: “Our goal is to assemble an army of aligned, vetted, trained, and prepared conservatives to go to work on Day One to deconstruct the Administrative State.” NAJ screen shot
By Glynn Wilson –
The conservative Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, also inspired by the radical Catholic cult Opus Dei, could be the albatross hanging around Trump’s neck that drags him down into icy defeat come November. The ice is already cracking.
Paul Dans, who directed the Heritage Foundation’s controversial 2025 Presidential Transition Project, or Project 2025, is stepping down from his role in August, according to an internal email to staff obtained by news organizations.
Paul Dans, director of the Heritage Foundation’s 2025 Presidential Transition Project, stands for a portrait at Heritage Foundation headquarters: NAJ screen shot
Politico claims the Daily Beast first broke the story.
Due to the viral traffic about the plan taking over social media of late, Trump has tried to publicly distance himself from it, and now his staff is running away from it like the plague. Trump keeps claiming he doesn’t know anything about it, even though many of the people working for Project 2025 are former top Trump administration officials.
“I have not seen it, have no idea who is in charge of it, and, unlike our very well received Republican Platform, had nothing to do with it,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post in July. He could be telling the truth about not reading it. It’s pretty obvious he’s never read much of anything in his entire life, or just suffers from a bad case of lack of comprehension.
Trump advisers within the campaign claim the Heritage Foundation’s 900 page plan to “destroy the administrative state” and turn America into a monarchy is a distraction and say they don’t like that it was portrayed as the game plan for the Trump White House.
“President Trump’s campaign has been very clear for over a year that Project 2025 had nothing to do with the campaign, did not speak for the campaign, and should not be associated with the campaign or the (former) president in any way,” Trump campaign top advisers, Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita, wrote in a joint statement.
“Reports of Project 2025’s demise would be greatly welcomed and should serve as notice to anyone or any group trying to misrepresent their influence with President Trump and his campaign— it will not end well for you,” Wiles and LaCivita wrote.
Dans’ departure does not mean the project, which has been repeatedly criticized by Democrats as well as Trump, is shutting down. The work — which includes policy and personnel prescriptions for a Republican administration — will continue, according to a person familiar with the project who was granted anonymity to discuss the matter.
The goal of Project 2025 was always to have their work done by the time of the Republican National Convention, which ended in mid July.
“Friends and patriots: to every thing there is a season. We completed what we set out to do, which was to create a unified conservative vision, bringing together over 110 leading organizations united behind the cause of deconstructing the administrative state,” Dans wrote in an email that was shared with POLITICO.
“This tool was built for any administration dedicated to conservative ideals to utilize. The work of the project was due to wrap with the nominating conventions of the political parties,” Dans wrote. “Our work is presently winding down, and I planned later in August to leave Heritage. Electoral season is upon us, and I want to direct all my efforts to winning bigly.”
“When we began Project 2025 in April 2022, we set a timeline for the project to conclude its policy drafting after the two party conventions this year, and we are sticking to that timeline,” Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, said in a tweet, “Paul, who built the project from scratch and bravely led this endeavor over the past two years, will be departing the team and moving up to the front where the fight remains.”
“We are extremely grateful for his and everyone’s work on Project 2025 and dedication to saving America,” Roberts wrote. “Our collective efforts to build a personnel apparatus for policymakers of all levels—federal, state, and local—will continue.”
There is another Trump campaign connection to Project 2025, however, as Trump’s new running mate, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance, wrote the foreword in an upcoming book about Project 2025 written by Roberts, “Dawn’s Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America.”
Before leading Project 2025, Dans served as the chief of staff for the U.S. Office of Personnel Management and served as the OPM’s White House liaison, where he worked with the White House Office of Presidential Personnel, which staffs presidential appointees across the federal government.
Democrats have criticized and scrutinized Project 2025, including a 900-page policy road map and a database of potential candidates for jobs within a potential Trump administration. Democrats have tried to tie vulnerable Republicans and Trump to the initiative, which they argue is a proposal for how Trump will reshape the government if he’s returned to office and have called it “extreme” and “dystopian.”
“Project 2025 is on the ballot because Donald Trump is on the ballot,” Harris campaign manager Julie Chavez Rodriguez said in a statement. “This is his agenda, written by his allies, for Donald Trump to inflict on our country.”
___
* The word albatross is sometimes used metaphorically to mean a psychological burden (most often associated with guilt or shame) that feels like a curse. It is an allusion to Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s poem The Rime of the Ancient Mariner (1798).
___
If you support truth in reporting with no paywall, and fearless writing with no popup ads or sponsored content, consider making a contribution today with GoFundMe or Patreon or PayPal.
Related Posts:
Before you continue, I’d like to ask if you could support our independent journalism as we head into one of the most critical news periods of our time in 2024.
The New American Journal is deeply dedicated to uncovering the escalating threats to our democracy and holding those in power accountable. With a turbulent presidential race and the possibility of an even more extreme Trump presidency on the horizon, the need for independent, credible journalism that emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election for our nation and planet has never been greater.
However, a small group of billionaire owners control a significant portion of the information that reaches the public. We are different. We don’t have a billionaire owner or shareholders. Our journalism is created to serve the public interest, not to generate profit. Unlike much of the U.S. media, which often falls into the trap of false equivalence in the name of neutrality, we strive to highlight the lies of powerful individuals and institutions, showing how misinformation and demagoguery can harm democracy.
Our journalists provide context, investigate, and bring to light the critical stories of our time, from election integrity threats to the worsening climate crisis and complex international conflicts. As a news organization with a strong voice, we offer a unique, outsider perspective that is often missing in American media.
Thanks to our unique reader-supported model, you can access the New American journal without encountering a paywall. This is possible because of readers like you. Your support keeps us independent, free from external influences, and accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for news.
Please help if you can.
American journalists need your help more than ever as forces amass against the free press and democracy itself. We must not let the crypto-fascists and the AI bots take over.
See the latest GoFundMe campaign here or click on this image.
Don't forget to listen to the new song and video.
Just because we are not featured on cable TV news talk shows, or TikTok videos, does not mean we are not getting out there in search engines and social media sites. We consistently get over a million hits a month.
Click to Advertise Here
